Energy Disputes and International Arbitration - Turkey - ONGUR&PARTNERS

Energy Disputes and International Arbitration - Turkey

Energy Disputes and International Energy Arbitration - Turkey


The main purpose of this article is to inform readers about settlement of energy disputes that arise in Turkey by international arbitration method and in particular ICSID arbitration process. We have taken many requests from our Clients in this regard, about the energy arbitration issues in Turkey.

I. Introduction

Several rapid, transparent and new legal resolution mechanisms are generated as an alternative to governmental adjudication since legal relations in social and commercial life necessitates resolutions which are becoming increasingly complicated and for which technical expertise is needed. One of the most frequently used components of this mechanism called “Alternative Dispute Resolutions” is arbitration. As an important market/player of the market, energy arbitration in Turkey is always in the agenda.


To start with, in the most common terms, arbitration is defined as a mechanism that foresees to settle disputes, which are or to be arisen between the parties in a legal relationship, by arbitrator(s) who are assigned by the parties, instead of resolving the disputes through governmental adjudication. This mechanism aims to ensure that disputes which arise between the parties are rapidly, transparently and effectively settled by arbitrator(s), who are assigned by the parties, according to rules and principles determined by the parties, instead of resolving the disputes through governmental adjudication in the classical sense; i.e. not by courts and judges.



II. Energy Disputes and Arbitration


As it is generally known, energy sector has a highly technical, capital-intensive and complicated composition in its nature. Thus, some challenges are faced when disputes regarding energy sector are sought to be resolved within the scope of governmental adjudication, as this issue necessitates technical expertise. Hence, it is possible to say that energy companies frequently prefer arbitration for settling their disputes, especially in the recent years.


In addition, investments in the energy sector are generally made as investments of multinational companies in developing or underdeveloped countries. It is a fact that investors in the energy sector take a certain risk by their investment activities in developing or underdeveloped countries, and they mostly face reliability challenges with regards to the legal system of the invested country. In this context, international arbitration draws attention as one of the most common methods used by multinational investors for assuring equal, effective and rapid dispute settlement in terms of their investments.



III. Types of Arbitration Applicable to Energy Disputes


Arbitration is a method not only applied in international disputes, but also applied in national disputes. Therefore, it is possible to review arbitration under two headings: national arbitration and international arbitration. Besides this classification, parties may agree on settling their disputes through arbitration before an expert institution or by “Ad hoc” arbitration. Within this framework, arbitration can be reviewed under two headings: “institutional arbitration” and “Ad Hoc arbitration”. It is a fact that especially disputes regarding energy are settled by institutional arbitration in practice. While organizations with expertise in institutional arbitration may vary, the most important ones can be listed as ICSID , ICC , LCIA , Arbitration Institute of Stockholm Chamber of Commerce. Nowadays, many disputes regarding energy are resolved before ICSID or ICC.



IV. Energy Disputes and ICSID


ICSID (International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes) is an organization established under The World Bank by ICSID Convention in 1965. Central administration of the organization is located at the same center with The World Bank in Washington/ USA. Today, there are totally 140 contracting states of ICSID; Turkey has been a contracting state of ICSID since 1988. ICSID Convention creates an arbitration venue displaying activities on disputes which are or to be arisen between investing companies and invested states. Therefore, there are three pillars of ICSID arbitration: the first pillar is a contracting state of ICSID Convention where investment will take place; the second pillar is an investing company registered in one of the contracting states of ICSID Convention; and the third pillar is an investment to be made by said investor. Thus, it is seen in ICSID arbitration that one of the parties must be a contracting state of ICSID Convention and the other party must be a company or companies that are investing in said contracting state and registered in one of the contracting states of ICSID Convention.



V. Dispute Settlement in ICSID Arbitration


In accordance with Article 36 of ICSID Convention, a state or an investing company, which wishes to settle their dispute by arbitration before ICSID, sends a written claim (request for arbitration) to the arbitration center. In the arbitration claim, the followings should be stated: name and surname of the parties; subject of the dispute; and consent of the parties for settlement of the dispute through ICSID, in other words the arbitration clause. If ICSID has judicial power for the dispute, of which arbitration claim is received, ICSID Secretariat sends a copy of this arbitration claim to the counterparty. Pursuant to Article 37 of ICSID Convention, one or more arbitrators, in odd numbers, are assigned by the parties. If the parties cannot agree on the number of arbitrators to be assigned, proceedings are carried out by 3 arbitrators. In such a case, each party assigns their own arbitrators, and these arbitrators unanimously determine a third arbitrator before the arbitration begins. Parties must agree on jurisprudence that shall be applied in the arbitration process. If the parties cannot come to an agreement on jurisprudence that shall be applied between the parties, the arbitration process shall be based on arbitration jurisprudence of the invested state. At first, necessary observations and evaluations in connection with the dispute are carried out by the arbitrators, and then arbitrators unanimously decide on the application of arbitration.



VI. Turkey and Arbitration


Arbitration method has found its field of practice in Turkish legal system, as the result of some essential legal and constitutional changes in the past decade in Turkey. It is clear after these changes that arbitration in Turkey -whether as a seat or as the dispute resolution method in the legal relationships with parties from Turkey- is feasible. Decisions of the Arbitral Tribunals are easily enforceable in Turkey.


In this regard, it is possible to observe that today most of the companies in Turkey as well as the governmental and administrative agencies see the arbitration as a natural component of energy sector. There are important energy arbitration cases and decisions in which Turkey is a party whether claimant or respondent.


Legal base of arbitration is established for ensuring that some public services to be given by foreigners through special legal contracts in Turkey in accordance with Law no. 4446 and dd. 13 August 1999 and amendments in 125, 47 and 155 Articles of the Constitution dated 1982 as well as Laws no. 4875, 4501 and 4868 entered into force following the latter. In this process, this has provided the opportunity for settlement of disputes through international arbitration which will arise on assigning foreigners for some public services, especially in the energy sector. However, foreign investors started to apply to arbitration mechanism, after some procedures nullified under judicial control, especially the procedures that are established by the management, or legislators amended legal regulations, which were in force at the date when foreign investments took place, in Turkey.



VII. Disputes for Which Turkey Is a Party Before ICSID


As it is known, investors may directly bring an action against legal entity of the invested state before ICSID mechanism. There are legal actions brought against the Government of Republic of Turkey before ICSID, and these cases are closely followed up by the press and the media. Besides, there are also legal actions brought before ICSID against third party states by some companies registered in Turkey.


Without a doubt, the biggest dispute in terms of its value with regards to the Republic of Turkey is the case brought by Libananco Corporation against the Government of Republic of Turkey before ICSID (Case No: ARB(AF)/06/2). This action was brought by Uzan Group as the result of the dispute regarding termination of concession agreements on the grounds that requirements of the concession agreements are not fulfilled with regards to Çukurova Elektrik and KEPEZ; Libananco Corporation, which is registered in South Cyprus and claims to be a shareholder of the corporation, applied ICSID arbitration against the Government of Republic of Turkey. As a result, the Tribunal has decided that it has no jurisdiction over the present case as Libananco has not proved that it owned shares in ÇEAŞ and Kepez before 12 June 2003.


Another action brought against the Government of Republic of Turkey before ICSID is the case where PSEG Global Inc., The North American Coal Cooperation and Konya Ilgın Elektrik Üretim ve Ticaret Ltd are applicants because of their energy investment to be made in Turkey (Case No: ARB/02/5). In consequence of the case, ICSID arbitral tribunal decided that the Government of Republic of Turkey shall compensate the Applicants, foreign investors, because of unilateral (ex-parte) changes in the investment conditions.


When it comes to actions brought against the invested states by the investors registered in Turkey before ICSID, the examples can be given as follows: the action brought against the Government of Pakistan by Bayındır Inşaat Turizm Ticaret ve Sanayi AŞ because of the dispute regarding investment for a highway project (Case No. ARB 03/29). Another example is the action brought against the Government of Azerbaijan by Barmek Holding AŞ before ICSID because of the dispute regarding energy investment (Case No. ARB 06/16).



VIII. Conclusion


Globalization has significant impacts in the field of law as much as in all other sectors. International investors and investments resulted with mechanisms that provide rapid settlement of many disputes independently of national adjudication, especially in the energy sector. Pursuant to international treaties, where the Government of Republic of Turkey is a contracting party, international investors should fulfill some liabilities for their investment commitments in Turkey. By taking into consideration that Turkey is a country which grows rapidly and attracts attention of foreign investors, it is crucially important that possible disputes are minimized. Indeed, some protection mechanisms, from which companies registered in Turkey and investing abroad may benefit, are applicable to foreign companies investing in Turkey. At this stage, Turkey should set a right strategy by establishing necessary legal regulations and properly using administrative mechanisms on the path of EU accession.